Overview of submitted results

A total of 45 groups signed the participation agreement for the SPE11. Of these, 18 groups submitted valid data of sufficient quality for inclusion in the comparative study; these groups will be referred to hereafter as the “participants” of SPE11. An additional two groups submitted data that were deemed unphysical and were subsequently excluded from the study.

Each participant was allowed to submit up to four sets of results, and partial submissions— including only one or two of the subcases—were also accepted. As a result, 13 participants submitted a total of 21 results to SPE11A, all 18 participants submitted a total of 34 results to SPE11B, while 14 participants submitted a total of 22 results to SPE11C. Table 2 provides an overview of the participating groups.

Main institutionShort nameMain contactSimulator name(s)SPE11ASPE11BSPE11C
University of CalgaryCalgaryZhangxing ChenPRSI-CGCS111
University of KielCAU-KielSebastian BauerOPM Flow 2024.04111
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationCSIROChris GreenMOOSE211
ChevronCTC-CNEYousef GhomianSLB IX 2023.4111
TU DelftDARTSDenis VoskovopenDARTS 1.1.4---
Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryGEOSJosh WhiteGEOS v1.0.1222
IFP Energies nouvellesIFPENDidier DingGeoxim122
King Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsKFUPMAballah YoussefEclipse-300, 2024-1-
OpenGoSimOpenGoSimPaolo OrsiniPFLOTRAN-OGS 1.8132
NORCEOPMTor Harald SandveOPM Flow 2024.10444
University of PauPau-InriaEtienne AhusbordeDuMux 3.8111
Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryPFLOTRANMichael NolePFLOTRAN111
Rice UniversityRiceAbbas FiroozabadiHigher-Order Reservoir Simulation Engine-2-
SINTEFSINTEFOlav MøynerJutulDarcy.jl v 0.2.28-43
SLBSLBMary-Ann GiddinsSLB IX 2024.2 and Eclipse Comp. 2024.2211
Stuttgart UniversityStuttgartKai WendelDuMux 3.9-4-
TetraTechTetraTechAdam TurnerSTOMP and tNavigator 24.2122
University of Texas at AustinUT-CSEEBruno FernandesSLB IX 2023.1 and CMG GEM 2023.30321
Total results per case213422